CVE-2023-29008 – @sveltejs/kit

Package

Manager: npm
Name: @sveltejs/kit
Vulnerable Version: >=0 <1.15.2

Severity

Level: High

CVSS v3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVSS v4.0: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

EPSS: 0.00139 pctl0.3457

Details

SvelteKit framework has Insufficient CSRF protection for CORS requests ### Summary The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. The protection is implemented at `kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js`. While the implementation does a sufficient job of mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying an upper-cased `Content-Type` header value. The browser will not send uppercase characters on form submission, but this check does not block all expected cross-site requests: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS#simple_requests ### Details The CSRF protection is implemented using the code shown below. ``` javascript const forbidden = is_form_content_type(request) && (request.method === 'POST' || request.method === 'PUT' || request.method === 'PATCH' || request.method === 'DELETE') && request.headers.get('origin') !== url.origin; if (forbidden) { const csrf_error = error(403, `Cross-site ${request.method} form submissions are forbidden`); if (request.headers.get('accept') === 'application/json') { return json(csrf_error.body, { status: csrf_error.status }); } return text(csrf_error.body.message, { status: csrf_error.status }); } ``` If the incoming request specifies a POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE method, the protection will compare the server’s origin with the value of the HTTP Origin header. A mismatch between these values signals that a potential attack has been detected. The final check is performed on the request’s `Content-Type` header whether the value is either `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`, `multipart/form-data` or `text/plain`. If all the previous checks pass, the request will be rejected with an 403 error response. However, `is_form_content_type`, which is responsible for checking the value of the `Content-Type` header, is not sufficient to mitigate all possible variations of this type of attack. Since this function is checking `Content-Type` with lower-cased values, and the browser accepts upper-cased `Content-Type` header to be sent, a CSRF attack performed with the `Content-Type` header that contains an upper-cased character (e.g., `text/plaiN`) can circumvent the protection and the request will be processed by the endpoint handler.  ### Impact If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. This may lead to all POST operations requiring authentication being allowed in the following cases: 1. If the target site sets `SameSite=None` on its auth cookie and the user visits a malicious site in a Chromium-based browser 2. If the target site doesn't set the `SameSite` attribute explicitly and the user visits a malicious site with Firefox/Safari with tracking protections turned off. 3. If the user is visiting a malicious site with a very outdated browser. ### Remediations It is preferred to update to SvelteKit 1.15.2. It is also recommended to explicitly set `SameSite` to a value other than `None` on authentication cookies especially if the upgrade cannot be done in a timely manner.

Metadata

Created: 2023-04-07T19:23:31Z
Modified: 2023-04-14T20:30:47Z
Source: https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2023/04/GHSA-gv7g-x59x-wf8f/GHSA-gv7g-x59x-wf8f.json
CWE IDs: ["CWE-352", "CWE-918"]
Alternative ID: GHSA-gv7g-x59x-wf8f
Finding: F100
Auto approve: 1