Cross-site request forgery In alextselegidis/easyappointments
Description
alextselegidis/easyappointments is Vulnerable to CSRF Protection Bypass
Summary
application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() only enforces CSRF for POST requests and returns early for non-POST methods. Several application endpoints perform state-changing operations while accepting parameters from GET (or $_REQUEST), so an attacker can perform CSRF by forcing a victim's browser to issue a crafted GET request. Impact: creation of admin accounts, modification of admin email/password, and full admin account takeover
Details
Repository / tested commit: alextselegidis/easyappointments — commit 41c9b93a5a2c185a914f204412324d8980943fd5.
Vulnerable file & function: application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() — around line 52. Link: .../application/core/EA_Security.php#L52.
Root cause: The function early-returns when the request is not POST:
// vulnerable snippet if (strtoupper($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD']) !== 'POST') { return $this->csrf_set_cookie(); }
Because of this, non-POST requests (GET/PUT/DELETE/etc.) never reach token validation. When application controllers accept state-changing parameters via GET or $_REQUEST, these requests bypass CSRF checks entirely and the application executes the state change.
Examples of vulnerable endpoints (observed during testing):
index.php/admins/store — create admin (accepts fields via GET)
index.php/admins/update — modify admin (accepts fields via GET)
index.php/account/save — modify account/password (accepts fields via GET)
Why this is critical: An attacker can host a simple page that issues requests (e.g., <form method="GET" action="..."> or an auto-submitting form). If an authenticated admin visits that page, the attacker can create an admin account, change admin email, or change password—enabling account takeover and full compromise of the application instance.
PoC
I will attach video proof showing how I add an admin via CSRF. Below are reproducible PoC artifacts and steps to reproduce locally
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3fea1034-c479-43d9-9c40-86f8ba0b33c1
Browser PoC (HTML)
Save one of the HTML files (example csrf_add_admin_account.html) on an attacker server and visit it with a browser where the admin is logged into Easy!Appointments:
<html> <body> <form method="GET" action="http://localhost:80/easyappointments/index.php/admins/store"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[first_name]" value="admin_add_by_csrf"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[last_name]" value="poc"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[email]" value="poc@gmail.com"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[mobile_number]" value=""> <input type="hidden" name="admin[address]" value="">...
another example for another endpoint
csrf_change_admin_email.html
<html> <body> <form method="GET" action="http://localhost:80/easyappointments/index.php/admins/update"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[first_name]" value="test"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[last_name]" value="cve"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[email]" value="test1@cve.com"> <input type="hidden" name="admin[mobile_number]" value=""> <input type="hidden" name="admin[address]" value="">...
Suggested remediation (recommended)
Provide two practical remediation paths mmediate and long-term:
Immediate (urgent, low-effort): Enforce CSRF checks for all methods and do not skip validation for non-POST. Minimal core fix:
This closes the common bypass route while keeping read-only GET behavior intact.
Stricter immediate option (no-bypass): Require a valid CSRF token for all methods (including GET) unless the URI is explicitly whitelisted in csrf_exclude_uris. This prevents GET-based bypass even if controllers remain unchanged but may require updates to legitimate GET consumers.
Long-term (recommended, correct fix):
Controller hardening: Update controllers so all state-changing actions accept only the proper HTTP method (POST/PUT/DELETE) .
Require re-authentication or confirmation for critical operations (email/password changes).
Set cookie flags: SameSite, Secure, and HttpOnly as appropriate.
Impact
Type: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) allowing account takeover / privilege escalation.
Who is impacted: Any deployment of Easy!Appointments using the vulnerable code where administrative or sensitive endpoints accept GET or use $_REQUEST (what i found is almost every endpoint work with GET and POST). Logged-in administrator users are at greatest risk.
Consequences: An attacker can create administrative accounts, change administrator emails/passwords (leading to password reset abuse), and fully compromise application instances and data.
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Ecosystem | Package | Affected version |
|---|---|---|
 composer | alextselegidis/easyappointments |
Aliases
Does your application use this vulnerable software?
During the free trial, our tools assess your application, identify vulnerabilities, and provide recommendations for their remediation.