Improper authorization control for web services In github.com/canonical/lxd
Description
lxd's non-recursive certificate listing bypasses per-object authorization and leaks all fingerprints
Summary
The GET /1.0/certificates endpoint (non-recursive mode) returns URLs containing fingerprints for all certificates in the trust store, bypassing the per-object can_view authorization check that is correctly applied in the recursive path. Any authenticated identity — including restricted, non-admin users — can enumerate all certificate fingerprints, exposing the full set of trusted identities in the LXD deployment.
Affected Component
lxd/certificates.go — certificatesGet (lines 185–192) — Non-recursive code path returns unfiltered certificate list.
CWE
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
Description
Core vulnerability: missing permission filter in non-recursive listing path
The certificatesGet handler obtains a permission checker at line 143 and correctly applies it when building the recursive response (lines 163-176). However, the non-recursive code path at lines 185-192 creates a fresh loop over the unfiltered baseCerts slice, completely bypassing the authorization check:
// lxd/certificates.go:139-193 func certificatesGet(d *Daemon, r *http.Request) response.Response { recursion := util.IsRecursionRequest(r) s := d.State() userHasPermission, err := s.Authorizer.GetPermissionChecker(r.Context(), auth.EntitlementCanView, entity.TypeCertificate) // ... ...
Inconsistency with other list endpoints confirms the bug
Five other list endpoints in the same codebase correctly filter results in both recursive and non-recursive paths:
Endpoint | File | Filters non-recursive? |
|---|---|---|
Instances | lxd/instances_get.go — instancesGet | Yes — filters before either path |
Images | lxd/images.go — doImagesGet | Yes — checks hasPermission for both paths |
Networks | lxd/networks.go — networksGet | Yes — filters outside recursion check |
Profiles | lxd/profiles.go — profilesGet | Yes — separate filter in non-recursive path |
Certificates | lxd/certificates.go — certificatesGet | No — unfiltered |
The certificates endpoint is the sole outlier, confirming this is an oversight rather than a design choice.
Access handler provides no defense
The endpoint uses allowAuthenticated as its AccessHandler (certificates.go:45), which only checks requestor.IsTrusted():
// lxd/daemon.go:255-267 // allowAuthenticated is an AccessHandler which allows only authenticated requests. // This should be used in conjunction with further access control within the handler // (e.g. to filter resources the user is able to view/edit). func allowAuthenticated(_ *Daemon, r *http.Request) response.Response { requestor, err := request.GetRequestor(r.Context()) // ... if requestor.IsTrusted() {...
The comment explicitly states that allowAuthenticated should be "used in conjunction with further access control within the handler" — which the non-recursive path fails to do.
Execution chain
Restricted authenticated user sends GET /1.0/certificates (no recursion parameter)
allowAuthenticated access handler passes because user is trusted (daemon.go:263)
certificatesGet creates permission checker for EntitlementCanView on TypeCertificate (line 143)
Loop at lines 163-176 filters baseCerts by permission — but only populates certResponses for recursive mode
Since !recursion, control reaches lines 185-192
New loop iterates ALL baseCerts (unfiltered) and builds URL list with fingerprints
Full list of certificate fingerprints returned to restricted user
Proof of Concept
# Preconditions: restricted (non-admin) trusted client certificate HOST=target.example PORT=8443 # 1) Non-recursive list: returns ALL certificate fingerprints (UNFILTERED) curl -sk --cert restricted.crt --key restricted.key \ "https://${HOST}:${PORT}/1.0/certificates" | jq '.metadata | length' ...
Impact
Identity enumeration: A restricted user can discover the fingerprints of all trusted certificates, revealing the complete set of identities in the LXD trust store.
Reconnaissance for targeted attacks: Fingerprints identify specific certificates used for inter-cluster communication, admin access, and other privileged operations.
RBAC bypass: In deployments using fine-grained RBAC (OpenFGA or built-in TLS authorization), the non-recursive path completely bypasses the intended per-object visibility controls.
Information asymmetry: Restricted users gain knowledge of the full trust topology, which the administrator explicitly intended to hide via per-certificate can_view entitlements.
Recommended Remediation
Option 1: Apply the permission filter to the non-recursive path (preferred)
Replace the unfiltered loop with one that checks userHasPermission, matching the pattern used in the recursive path and in all other list endpoints:
// lxd/certificates.go — replace lines 185-192 if !recursion { body := []string{} for _, baseCert := range baseCerts { if !userHasPermission(entity.CertificateURL(baseCert.Fingerprint)) { continue } certificateURL := api.NewURL().Path(version.APIVersion, "certificates", baseCert.Fingerprint).String()...
Option 2: Build both response types in a single filtered loop
Restructure the function to build both the URL list and the recursive response in the same permission-checked loop, eliminating the possibility of divergent filtering:
err = d.State().DB.Cluster.Transaction(r.Context(), func(ctx context.Context, tx *db.ClusterTx) error { baseCerts, err = dbCluster.GetCertificates(ctx, tx.Tx()) if err != nil { return err } certResponses = make([]*api.Certificate, 0, len(baseCerts)) certURLs = make([]string, 0, len(baseCerts))...
Option 2 is structurally safer as it prevents the two paths from diverging in the future.
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Ecosystem | Package | Affected version | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|---|
go | 0.0.0-20260224152359-d936c90d47cf |
Aliases
References