Authentication mechanism absence or evasion In github.com/nhost/nhost

Description

Nhost Vulnerable to Account Takeover via OAuth Email Verification Bypass ## Summary Nhost automatically links an incoming OAuth identity to an existing Nhost account when the email addresses match. This is only safe when the email has been verified by the OAuth provider. Nhost's controller trusts a profile.EmailVerified boolean that is set by each provider adapter. The vulnerability is that several provider adapters do not correctly populate this field they either silently drop a verified field the provider API actually returns (Discord), or they fall back to accepting unconfirmed emails and marking them as verified (Bitbucket). Two Microsoft providers (AzureAD, EntraID) derive the email from non-ownership-proving fields like the user principal name, then mark it verified. The result is that an attacker can present an email they don't own to Nhost, have the OAuth identity merged into the victim's account, and receive a full authenticated session. ## Root Cause In services/auth/go/controller/sign_in_id_token.go, providerFlowSignIn() links a new provider identity to an existing account by email match with no verification guard: go // sign_in_id_token.go:267-296 func (ctrl *Controller) providerFlowSignIn( ctx context.Context, user sql.AuthUser, providerFound bool, provider string, providerUserID string, logger *slog.Logger, ) (*api.Session, *APIError) { if !providerFound { // Links attacker's provider identity to the victim's account. // profile.EmailVerified is NEVER checked here. ctrl.wf.InsertUserProvider(ctx, user.ID, provider, providerUserID, logger) } // Issues a full session to the attacker. session, _ := ctrl.wf.NewSession(ctx, user, nil, logger) return session, nil } The controller places full trust in whatever profile.EmailVerified the adapter returned. The vulnerabilities below show how that trust is violated. ## Correct Implementation (For Reference) ### GitHub: providers/github.go GitHub fetches /user/emails and reads the verified boolean per entry. selectEmail() picks only verified emails. The result is correctly mapped: go selected := selectEmail(emails) // only selects verified: true entries return oidc.Profile{ Email: selected.Email, EmailVerified: selected.Verified, // real boolean from GitHub API ... } ## Vulnerable Providers ### 1. Discord: providers/discord.go The Discord GET /users/@me API returns a verified boolean field. Per Discord's official documentation and example User Object: json { "id": "80351110224678912", "username": "Nelly", "email": "[email protected]", "verified": true } The Nhost struct is missing this field. Go's JSON decoder silently discards it: go type discordUserProfile struct { ID string `json:"id"` Username string `json:"username"` Discriminator string `json:"discriminator"` Email string `json:"email"` Locale string `json:"locale"` Avatar string `json:"avatar"` // MISSING: Verified bool `json:"verified"` } The adapter then sets: go EmailVerified: userProfile.Email != "", // always true when email is present Why this is exploitable: Discord allows users to create account without verifying the email address and change their email address without immediately verifying it. After changing email, the account has "verified": false in the API response until the user clicks a confirmation link. An attacker can change their Discord email to the victim's address, leave it unverified, and the Nhost adapter will still present EmailVerified: true, because it never reads the verified field at all. Fix: go type discordUserProfile struct { ID string `json:"id"` Username string `json:"username"` Discriminator string `json:"discriminator"` Email string `json:"email"` Verified bool `json:"verified"` // add this Locale string `json:"locale"` Avatar string `json:"avatar"` } return oidc.Profile{ Email: userProfile.Email, EmailVerified: userProfile.Verified, // use it ... } ### 2. Bitbucket: providers/bitbucket.go The Bitbucket adapter correctly queries /user/emails for confirmed entries, but introduces a fallback that defeats its own check: go // bitbucket.go:103-132 for _, e := range emailResp.Values { if e.IsConfirmed { primaryEmail = e.Email break } else if fallbackEmail == "" { fallbackEmail = e.Email // stores unconfirmed email } } if primaryEmail == "" { if fallbackEmail == "" { return oidc.Profile{}, ErrNoConfirmedBitbucketEmail } primaryEmail = fallbackEmail // uses unconfirmed email } return oidc.Profile{ Email: primaryEmail, EmailVerified: primaryEmail != "", // marks it true anyway ... } Bitbucket's /user/emails endpoint returns all emails, including unconfirmed ones with "is_confirmed": false. An attacker can add the victim's email to their Bitbucket account without confirming it, triggering the fallback path. Fix: go if primaryEmail == "" { // Remove the fallback entirely no confirmed email means no sign-in return oidc.Profile{}, ErrNoConfirmedBitbucketEmail } ### 3. AzureAD: providers/azuread.go AzureAD derives the email through a chain of fallbacks from the userinfo response: go email := userProfile.Email if email == "" { email = userProfile.Prefer // "preferred_username" not an email ownership proof } if email == "" { email = userProfile.UPN // User Principal Name not an email ownership proof } return oidc.Profile{ Email: email, EmailVerified: email != "", // marked verified regardless of source ... } preferred_username and UPN are internal Azure AD identity attributes. A UPN like [email protected] or a custom UPN set to [email protected] does not prove that the user controls that external email address. Yet Nhost will treat it as a verified email claim and merge identities if an existing account matches. Fix: Do not fall back to preferred_username or UPN for account-linking email. Only use a field that Azure AD explicitly certifies as a verified external email (or use the OIDC id_token with the email_verified claim from Azure's v2 endpoint). ### 4. EntraID: providers/entraid.go Same pattern as AzureAD. The EntraID adapter reads from graph.microsoft.com/oidc/userinfo but the struct has no email_verified field: go type entraidUser struct { Sub string `json:"sub"` GivenName string `json:"givenname"` FamilyName string `json:"familyname"` Email string `json:"email"` // MISSING: EmailVerified bool `json:"email_verified"` } return oidc.Profile{ Email: userProfile.Email, EmailVerified: userProfile.Email != "", // unconditional ... } Microsoft's OIDC userinfo endpoint does include an email_verified claim per the OpenID Connect specification. Nhost ignores it. Fix: Add EmailVerified bool \json:"email_verified"`` to the struct and map it correctly. ## Attack Scenario (Discord) Setup: An Nhost application uses Discord OAuth. A victim has an account with [email protected]. 1. Attacker opens Discord → User Settings → Account, changes email to [email protected], and dismisses the dialog, without clicking the confirmation link. 2. At this point Discord's API returns "email": "[email protected]", "verified": false for the attacker's account. 3. Attacker visits the target application and clicks Sign in with Discord. 4. Nhost fetches the Discord profile. The missing Verified field in the struct causes the JSON decoder to

Mitigation

Update Impact

Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.

Ecosystem
Package
Affected version
Patched versions