Lack of data validation - Path Traversal In thorsten/phpmyfaq
Description
phpMyFAQ has Potential Authenticated Path Traversal in PDF Export
Summary
There is an authenticated path traversal condition in the PDF export functionality, specifically within the PDF image resolution logic.
The issue may allow a privileged FAQ editor to cause the application to attempt reading files outside the intended content directory during PDF generation.
Affected Component
File:
src/phpMyFAQ/Export/Pdf/Wrapper.php
Function:
concatenatePaths()
Root Cause
The path resolution logic relies on locating the substring "content" within a user-controlled path:
$pos = strpos($trimmedFile, 'content'); $relativePath = substr($trimmedFile, (int) $pos);
If "content" is not present, strpos() returns false, which becomes 0 when cast to an integer.
As a result, the entire attacker-controlled path is preserved.
Example:
$trimmedFile = "../../../etc/passwd"; $pos = false; $relativePath = "../../../etc/passwd";
The resulting path is later processed by:
file_get_contents($resolvedPath);
without canonicalization or a root-directory containment check.
Observed Data Flow
FAQ Content -> PDF Export -> WriteHTML() -> Wrapper::Image() ->...
Potential Impact
Based on code review, a user with FAQ editing privileges may be able to store HTML containing crafted image paths that are processed during PDF generation.
Potential consequences may include:
Path traversal outside the intended content directory
Local file read attempts during PDF export
Possible disclosure of readable files depending on file type, sanitization behavior, and PDF rendering constraints
Discovery Method
This issue was initially detected by an internally developed SAST tool during analysis of the phpMyFAQ source code.
The finding was then manually investigated and validated through code review.
While the original scanner output classified the issue as a generic path traversal/local file inclusion pattern, manual analysis identified the specific root cause in the path resolution logic of concatenatePaths().
Potential Exploitation Scenario
The following scenario is based on code review and intended to illustrate the potential impact:
A user with FAQ editing privileges creates or modifies a FAQ entry.
The FAQ content contains an HTML image tag with a crafted relative path that does not include the expected content directory reference.
The HTML content is stored and later processed by the PDF export functionality.
When a user requests the PDF version of the FAQ, the application invokes WriteHTML(), which eventually reaches Wrapper::Image().
concatenatePaths() constructs a filesystem path without canonicalization or directory containment validation.
The resulting path reaches file_get_contents(), causing the application to attempt reading a file outside the intended content directory.
Depending on sanitization behavior, file permissions, image validation, and PDF rendering behavior, the contents of the targeted file may potentially be exposed to the PDF consumer.
Based on my current analysis, exploitation would require a user capable of editing FAQ content and is therefore not considered an anonymous or unauthenticated attack vector.
Suggested Remediation
Consider replacing substring-based path anchoring with:
realpath() canonicalization
Strict root-directory containment checks
Explicit allowlisting of permitted image locations
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Ecosystem | Component | Affected version | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|---|
packagist | 4.1.5 | ||
packagist | 4.1.5 |
Aliases
References