Sensitive information sent insecurely In org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client
Description
async-http-client: Cookie header not stripped on cross-origin redirect
Summary
async-http-client leaks Cookie headers to cross-origin redirect targets. When following a redirect across a security boundary (different origin, or HTTPS→HTTP downgrade), the propagatedHeaders() method in Redirect30xInterceptor.java strips Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers but does not strip Cookie, so session cookies and other sensitive cookie values are forwarded to the redirect target — which may be attacker-controlled.
Details
The vulnerability is in client/src/main/java/org/asynchttpclient/netty/handler/intercept/Redirect30xInterceptor.java.
The caller computes stripAuth on each redirect:
boolean sameBase = request.getUri().isSameBase(newUri); boolean stripAuth = !sameBase || schemeDowngrade || stripAuthorizationOnRedirect; // ... requestBuilder.setHeaders(propagatedHeaders(request, realm, keepBody, stripAuth));
stripAuth is true whenever the redirect crosses an origin, downgrades the scheme, or the caller opted in via AsyncHttpClientConfig#isStripAuthorizationOnRedirect().
In the vulnerable version, propagatedHeaders() only removes Authorization and Proxy-Authorization in that branch — Cookie is left untouched:
private static HttpHeaders propagatedHeaders(Request request, Realm realm, boolean keepBody, boolean stripAuthorization) { HttpHeaders headers = request.getHeaders() .remove(HOST) .remove(CONTENT_LENGTH); if (!keepBody) { headers.remove(CONTENT_TYPE); }...
The companion test class RedirectCredentialSecurityTest covers Authorization / Proxy-Authorization stripping on cross-origin redirects and scheme downgrades, but has no coverage for Cookie, which is why the regression went unnoticed.
Proof of concept
import org.asynchttpclient.*; AsyncHttpClient client = asyncHttpClient(); // trusted-api.com responds 302 -> https://evil.com Request request = new RequestBuilder("GET") .setUrl("https://trusted-api.com/endpoint") .setHeader("Cookie", "session=abc123; csrf=xyz789; api_key=secret")...
Impact
Session hijacking — leaked session cookies allow impersonation.
CSRF token theft — CSRF tokens carried in cookies are disclosed.
API key theft — API keys stored in cookies are disclosed.
Privacy — tracking identifiers leak to third-party origins.
Realistic attack paths:
Open-redirect in a trusted API endpoint.
Compromised CDN or API gateway injecting redirects.
MITM on a plaintext hop in the redirect chain.
Fix
Add COOKIE to the headers removed alongside AUTHORIZATION / PROXY_AUTHORIZATION on the security-boundary branch:
if (stripAuthorization) { headers.remove(AUTHORIZATION) .remove(PROXY_AUTHORIZATION) .remove(COOKIE); } else if (realm != null && (realm.getScheme() == AuthScheme.NTLM || realm.getScheme() == AuthScheme.SCRAM_SHA_256)) { headers.remove(AUTHORIZATION) .remove(PROXY_AUTHORIZATION);...
Note that the URI-scoped CookieStore will re-add any cookies that legitimately match the new target after propagatedHeaders returns, so legitimate cross-origin sessions tracked by the client are not broken.
Fixed in 3.0.10 and 2.15.0 by commit 3b0e3e9e.
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Ecosystem | Package | Affected version | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|---|
maven | 3.0.10, 2.15.0 |
Aliases
References