Lack of data validation - Path Traversal In nltk
Description
NLTK: Symlink escape in CorpusReader allows arbitrary local file read outside the corpus root
Summary
nltk.corpus.reader.api.CorpusReader.open() can be used to read files outside the intended corpus root via a symlink placed inside that root. Although NLTK blocks absolute paths and .. traversal, the current boundary check is only lexical and does not account for symlink resolution. This leads to an arbitrary local file read / filesystem sandbox bypass for applications that rely on CorpusReader or FileSystemPathPointer to restrict file access.
Details
The vulnerable flow is:
nltk/corpus/reader/api.py:222
CorpusReader.open() blocks absolute paths and .., then calls self._root.join(file).open()
nltk/data.py:398
FileSystemPathPointer.join() joins the requested file ID and checks whether the resulting path still appears to remain under the configured root
The problem is that the check is based on the lexical path after os.path.normpath(), not on the resolved path after following symlinks.
Current behavior:
CorpusReader.open() rejects:
absolute paths
.. path traversal
FileSystemPathPointer.join() computes:
joined = os.path.normpath(os.path.join(self._path, fileid))
root = os.path.normpath(self._path)
It allows the access if joined starts with root
This misses the case where a path stays inside the root lexically, but resolves outside the root via a symlink already present under the allowed directory.
Example:
JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root/link/secret.txt REALPATH=/tmp/outside/secret.txt
JOINED still appears to be inside the root, but REALPATH is outside it.
This is distinct from simple ../ traversal:
the file ID is not absolute
the file ID does not contain ..
the escape only happens after filesystem resolution of a symlink under the allowed root
PoC
Reproduced in an isolated Docker sandbox using the local nltk clone.
Minimal Python PoC:
import os import tempfile from nltk.corpus.reader.api import CorpusReader root = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk-root-") outside_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk-out-") outside_file = os.path.join(outside_dir, "secret.txt") ...
Observed result:
secret-data
Docker re-test output:
ROOT=/tmp/nltk-root-jjxay3if OUTSIDE_DIR=/tmp/nltk-out-1kef36e0 JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root-jjxay3if/link/secret.txt REALPATH=/tmp/nltk-out-1kef36e0/secret.txt READ_OK=secret-data INSIDE_ROOT=True REAL_INSIDE_ROOT=False
Additional impact validation using a system file:
ROOT=/tmp/nltk-root-_h5x4m19 JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root-_h5x4m19/hostfile REALPATH=/etc/hostname HOSTNAME_READ=48dafb244af3 INSIDE_ROOT=True REAL_INSIDE_ROOT=False
This shows that the issue is not limited to attacker-created files outside the root; it can also read existing system files that are readable by the application user.
Impact
This is an arbitrary local file read / symlink escape issue.
Who is impacted:
applications that accept attacker-controlled corpus directories, extracted datasets, or package contents
applications that rely on NLTK corpus readers as a trust boundary for file access
any deployment where an attacker can place or influence files inside the allowed corpus root
Practical impact includes disclosure of:
application secrets stored on disk
local configuration files
private datasets
process-exposed files such as /proc/self/environ
system files readable by the running user
The issue is best described as a filesystem sandbox bypass caused by improper link resolution before file access.
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Aliases
References