Improper authorization control for web services In praisonai-platform
Description
PraisonAI has Cross-Workspace IDOR and Privilege Escalation via Platform API ### Summary The PraisonAI Platform API has two authorization failures that together break workspace isolation. The service layer for issues and projects performs global primary-key lookups without checking workspace ownership, so any authenticated user can read, modify, and delete resources in any workspace just by swapping UUIDs in their API requests. On top of that, every member management endpoint (add, update role, remove) only requires min_role="member", which lets any workspace member promote themselves to owner and kick out the original owner. A low-privilege member of one workspace can steal data from every other workspace and take over any workspace they belong to. Both issues come from the same gap: the route layer pulls workspace_id from the URL and verifies membership, but the service layer ignores the workspace scope for resource lookups and ignores the caller's role level for member operations. The require_workspace_member() dependency does its job correctly. The problem is that the service layer doesn't use the information it provides. ### Details #### Part 1: Cross-Workspace IDOR (Issues and Projects) Vulnerable Files: - praisonai_platform/services/issue_service.py - praisonai_platform/services/project_service.py - praisonai_platform/api/routes/issues.py - praisonai_platform/api/routes/projects.py There is a consistent split between the route layer and the service layer. Routes pull workspace_id from the URL and verify membership: GET /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ require_workspace_member() checks this But the service methods these routes call perform global lookups that ignore workspace_id entirely: IssueService.get(), line 72: python async def get(self, issue_id: str) -> Optional[Issue]: """Get issue by ID.""" return await self._session.get(Issue, issue_id) ProjectService.get(), line 47: python async def get(self, project_id: str) -> Optional[Project]: """Get project by ID.""" return await self._session.get(Project, project_id) Both use session.get(Model, pk), which is a global lookup by primary key with no WHERE workspace_id = ? filter. Compare that with the properly scoped list_for_workspace() methods in the same files: IssueService.list_for_workspace(), line 76: python async def list_for_workspace(self, workspace_id: str, ...) -> list[Issue]: stmt = select(Issue).where(Issue.workspace_id == workspace_id) # ... properly scoped The listing is scoped correctly. The get, update, and delete methods are not. Since update() and delete() in both services call self.get() internally, the workspace bypass cascades through all write operations too. Route that discards workspace_id, issues.py line 82: python @router.get("/{issue_id}", response_model=IssueResponse) async def get_issue( workspace_id: str, # Extracted from URL issue_id: str, user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # Membership verified session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), ): svc = IssueService(session) issue = await svc.get(issue_id) # workspace_id never passed to service All affected operations: | Service | Method | Line | Workspace scoped? | |---------|--------|------|-------------------| | IssueService | get() | 72 | No, uses session.get(Issue, issue_id) | | IssueService | update() | 97 | No, calls self.get(issue_id) | | IssueService | delete() | 150 | No, calls self.get(issue_id) | | IssueService | list_for_workspace() | 76 | Yes, filters by workspace_id | | ProjectService | get() | 47 | No, uses session.get(Project, project_id) | | ProjectService | update() | 62 | No, calls self.get(project_id) | | ProjectService | delete() | 88 | No, calls self.get(project_id) | | ProjectService | get_stats() | 97 | No, only filters by project_id | | ProjectService | list_for_workspace() | 51 | Yes, filters by workspace_id | #### Part 2: Workspace Takeover via Missing Role Enforcement Vulnerable Files: - praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py (member management routes) - praisonai_platform/api/deps.py (authorization dependency) - praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py (role hierarchy implementation) The authorization dependency supports role-based access: require_workspace_member(), deps.py line 54: python async def require_workspace_member( workspace_id: str, user: AuthIdentity = Depends(get_current_user), session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), min_role: str = "member", # Accepts higher roles, but nobody passes them ) -> AuthIdentity: member_svc = MemberService(session) has = await member_svc.has_role(workspace_id, user.id, min_role) if not has: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, ...) The has_role() method correctly implements role hierarchy: MemberService.has_role(), member_service.py line 80: python async def has_role(self, workspace_id, user_id, required_role) -> bool: """Role hierarchy: owner > admin > member.""" member = await self.get(workspace_id, user_id) if member is None: return False role_levels = {"owner": 3, "admin": 2, "member": 1} user_level = role_levels.get(member.role, 0) required_level = role_levels.get(required_role, 0) return user_level >= required_level This works correctly, but no route ever calls require_workspace_member with min_role="owner" or min_role="admin". Every member management route uses the default "member": Self-promotion, workspaces.py line 115: python @router.patch("/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}", response_model=MemberResponse) async def update_member_role( workspace_id: str, user_id: str, body: MemberUpdate, user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # min_role="member" session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), ): member_svc = MemberService(session) member = await member_svc.update_role(workspace_id, user_id, body.role) # No check: is user modifying their own role? (self-promotion) # No check: is body.role > caller's current role? (escalation) # No check: is target a higher role than caller? (modifying superiors) Owner removal, workspaces.py line 130: python @router.delete("/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}", status_code=204) async def remove_member( workspace_id: str, user_id: str, user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # min_role="member" ... ): member_svc = MemberService(session) removed = await member_svc.remove(workspace_id, user_id) # No check: is target a higher role than caller? # No check: is this the last owner? Three checks are missing from update_member_role: self-modification, upward escalation, and modifying superiors. Two checks are missing from remove_member: role hierarchy and last-owner protection. ### PoC Prerequisites: - A running PraisonAI Platform instance with default configuration - No special configuration required Server setup: bash cd /path/to/PraisonAI pip install -e "src/praisonai-platform" python -m uvicorn praisonai_platform.api.app:create_app \ --factory --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8000 #### Scenario: Full attack chain (IDOR + Privilege Escalation) Step 1: Victim (CEO) creates workspace with sensitive data bash BASE="http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/v1" # Register CEO VICTIM=$(curl -sfL -X POST "$BASE/auth/register" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"Secure123!","name":"CEO"}') VICTIM_TOKEN=$(echo "$VICTIM" | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])") VICTIM_ID=$(echo "$VICTIM" | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['user']['id'])") # CEO creates workspace with confidential issue VICTIM_WS=$(curl -sfL -X POST "$BASE/workspaces/" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \ -d '{"name":"Executive Board"}' \ | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['id'])") ISSUE_ID=$(curl -sfL -X POST "$BASE/workspaces/$VICTIM_WS/issues/" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \ -d '{"title":"M&A Target List","description":"Acquiring CompanyX for $2B. Board approved. Do not disclose."}' \ | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['id'])") echo "Victim workspace: $VICTIM_WS" echo "Secret issue: $ISSUE_ID" Step 2: Attacker registers and creates their own workspace ```bash
Mitigation
Update Impact
Minimal update. May introduce new vulnerabilities or breaking changes.
Ecosystem | Package | Affected version | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|---|
pypi | 0.1.4 |
Aliases
References